Thursday, 7 August 2008
On Monday Susanne noted that ACMA had released their internet content filtering report. Well, as you can imagine, there’s been some blogospheric and professional reaction:
- SAGE (the Sysadmin Guild of Australia) has slammed the artificiality of the methodology used (press release, media report);
- Somebodythinkofthechildren has produced a great summary set of links to other reactions, here (hat tip: Peter Black).
Bookmark or share this story:
Del.icio.us | 
Digg | 
Reddit | 
ma.gnolia.com | 
Newsvine | 
furl |
Technorati | 
IceRocket | 
PubSub | 
Google | 
Yahoo
One Response to “More on internet content filtering”
Leave a Reply
Do not post material that is defamatory or obscene, that infringes any third party's copyrights, trademarks or other proprietary rights, or that violates any other right of any other person.
We reserve the right to remove or edit any comment for any reason.
Note: Posting more than two links in a comment may cause it not to appear because it will be submitted for moderation. Also, links in comments will not be counted by Google, so spamming is pointless.
Posts
Comments
Posts
November 13th, 2008 at 11:18 am
I notice that since the release of the filtering trial report there has been no other articles commenting on this issue on Lawfont – you haven’t been gagged by the government have you?!
Can someone please review from a legal perspective the new two-tiered (in part the particular mandatory filtering tier) legislation intended to be passed next year?
Thanks,
Richard.