<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>LawFont.com</title>
	<link>http://www.lawfont.com</link>
	<description>an analysis of law, technology, economics, and policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:56:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>The fun of (observing one&#8217;s own use of) obscure words</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Taking a look through the LawFont log (as one does - it&#8217;s kind of like self-Googling - an attempt to make one feel important) I came across a link to LawFont from a website called &#8220;the rarest words&#8220;.  This is their self-description:
What&#8217;s this? If you look at just the main pages of all sites [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/05/12/the-fun-of-observing-ones-own-use-of-obscure-words/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>More on the IceTV judgment</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Following up from my long post on the case, some more comments and things on IceTV that are interesting:

This thread discussing the decision in the Digital TV Forum
This post on the case, with a reference to a really interesting paper by Kathy Bowrey on digital television and copyright;
The responding press release from IceTV (foreshadowing a [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/05/12/more-on-the-icetv-judgment/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Book plug (no, not mine) - David Lindsay&#8217;s book on domain names</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Today we had the pleasure of a staff seminar up here at the University of Queensland Law School - by David Lindsay, an old colleague of mine from my melbourne days.  David these days is at Monash University Law School.

David&#8217;s recently published a book with Hart called International Domain Name Law. 
Now, I remember [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/05/09/book-plug-no-not-mine-david-lindsays-book-on-domain-names/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Frustrated with Burmese Junta Inaction? Donate to a group that have people in-country</title>
		<description><![CDATA[And double your money, by doing it via the Club Troppo/John Quiggin appeal.  Details here.
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/05/09/frustrated-with-burmese-junta-inaction-donate-to-a-group-that-have-people-in-country/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>All our program guides are belongs to us</title>
		<description><![CDATA[As I flagged yesterday, yesterday morning the appeal judgment in the IceTV case was handed down by the Full Federal Court.  This truly was an all-stars copyright case: interesting issues, an all-star IP bench (including the CJ himself, plus two senior IP heavies - Justices Lindgren and Sackville) (note too - the same bench [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/05/09/all-our-program-guides-are-belongs-to-us/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>IceTV judgment handed down</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick note: the Full Federal Court judgment in IceTV is now up on AustLII.  The case concerns the electronic program guide for television: Channel Nine sued a company which was providing the EPG for people wanting to make fully functional use of digital television recorders.  Background on the case here.
At first [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/05/08/icetv-judgment-handed-down/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>You can&#8217;t keep a good lobby group down&#8230;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2020 Submissions are online - over 8,000 of them.  And I&#8217;m impressed: the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft have put a submission in, and there are no prizes for guessing their favourite big picture ideas for making Australia a great place:
We encourage the 2020 Summit to commit to the following measures: - acknowledge [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/04/17/you-cant-keep-a-good-lobby-group-down/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Statistics and judges</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Fascinating exchange in the US Supreme Court on statistics, deterrence, and the death penalty.  Quote of the day: &#8216;can a constitutional question of this magnitude turn on econometric rabbit-holes&#8217;?
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/04/17/statistics-and-judges/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Academic aside - wireless in the classroom</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Periodically there&#8217;s a debate about whether law profs should have the right to &#8216;turn off&#8217; internet access in the classroom.  I for one can certainly say that as a lecturer, I&#8217;m pretty confident I can tell broadly, which of the many students with laptops are tuned out, and at times, I do wish I [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/04/17/academic-aside-wireless-in-the-classroom/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>What customer &#8216;value&#8217; are copyright owners entitled to?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Patry has another must-read, where he&#8217;s analysed a submission of the &#8216;Music Business Group&#8217; in the UK opposing the introduction of a personal format-shifting exception not unlike the one we introduced in Australia in 2006.
You really must go and read Bill&#8217;s post, but one thing that really struck me was the summarised argument by [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/04/17/what-customer-value-are-copyright-owners-entitled-to/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
