<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LawFont.com &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawfont.com/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawfont.com</link>
	<description>an analysis of law, technology, economics, and policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:57:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>ACTA and transparency</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/20/acta-and-transparency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/20/acta-and-transparency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting comment from Michael Geist today on transparency and ACTA &#8211; making the argument that the failure to reveal text is far from normal in relation to plurilateral or multilateral agreements.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/20/acta-and-transparency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More ACTA commentary</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/06/more-acta-commentary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/06/more-acta-commentary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jamie Love on the Huffington Post here. EFF here. Howard Knopf here. Nic Suzor/Electronic Frontiers Australia here. New Zealand Herald here. Atlantic here. The IDG here. Intellectual Property Watch here. I would endorse the view expressed in the letter reproduced on the Huffington Post: The only rationale for keeping the proposed ACTA text from the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/06/more-acta-commentary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Geist on ACTA</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/04/geist-on-acta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/04/geist-on-acta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geist has a new report on ACTA here, with some discussion of the potential inclusions in an internet text. Nothing that would surprise an Australian, given our experience with the AUSFTA. I do, strongly, agree with Michael here, when he notes that: On the international front, it provides firm confirmation that the treaty is not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/04/geist-on-acta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACTA: here we go again?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/04/acta-here-we-go-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/04/acta-here-we-go-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s that time again. Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (“ACTA”) negotiators are gathering again, this time in South Korea. ACTA has been off the radar for a little while now, overshadowed by other IP developments. But now we’re up to the 6th round of negotiations, and, it would seem, interesting times await: according to the agenda that’s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/04/acta-here-we-go-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>on blogging</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/02/23/on-blogging/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/02/23/on-blogging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi everyone (or at least, those of you who are still there. probably just an echo, right?). Been a while, hasn&#8217;t it? I&#8217;d vowed to resist, so far as possible, the blogging thing on IP. There were good reasons for resisting: I have lots of other work to do; I need to spend time working [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/02/23/on-blogging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright Teaching Resources (make your own anti-piracy ad!)</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/25/copyright-teaching-resources-make-your-own-anti-piracy-ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/25/copyright-teaching-resources-make-your-own-anti-piracy-ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AFACT have a new (I think?) set of resources for teaching copyright to school kids.You can write your own copyright law (results of that might be interesting). You can even make your own anti-piracy ad! yay! (of course, people have been doing that for a while now&#8230; and here&#8230;. and here&#8230;.) :) I&#8217;ve yet to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/25/copyright-teaching-resources-make-your-own-anti-piracy-ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technical problems</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/09/25/technical-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/09/25/technical-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry about the outage &#8211; had some technical problems for much of today. Lawfont is back and should be fine now (touch wood)&#8230; .]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/09/25/technical-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on IceTV</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/06/27/more-on-icetv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/06/27/more-on-icetv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2008/06/27/more-on-icetv/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember that IceTV judgment I talked about a few times? The one about copyright in TV program guides? Two more items of information. In a comment on this blog, Peter Vogel points out that the court has now made orders in the case: IceTV is permanently restrained from reproducing in a material form Nine Program [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/06/27/more-on-icetv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Statistics and judges</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/04/17/statistics-and-judges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/04/17/statistics-and-judges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2008/04/17/statistics-and-judges/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fascinating exchange in the US Supreme Court on statistics, deterrence, and the death penalty. Quote of the day: &#8216;can a constitutional question of this magnitude turn on econometric rabbit-holes&#8217;?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/04/17/statistics-and-judges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Academic aside &#8211; wireless in the classroom</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/04/17/academic-aside-wireless-in-the-classroom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/04/17/academic-aside-wireless-in-the-classroom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2008/04/17/academic-aside-wireless-in-the-classroom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Periodically there&#8217;s a debate about whether law profs should have the right to &#8216;turn off&#8217; internet access in the classroom. I for one can certainly say that as a lecturer, I&#8217;m pretty confident I can tell broadly, which of the many students with laptops are tuned out, and at times, I do wish I could [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/04/17/academic-aside-wireless-in-the-classroom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

