<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LawFont.com &#187; Telco</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawfont.com/category/tech/telco/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawfont.com</link>
	<description>an analysis of law, technology, economics, and policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:57:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twentieth Century Fox v BT (the Newzbin2 website blocking decision)</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/08/01/twentieth-century-fox-v-bt-the-newzbin2-website-blocking-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/08/01/twentieth-century-fox-v-bt-the-newzbin2-website-blocking-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=1056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Late last week Justice Arnold in the UK High Court issued his judgment in Twentieth Century Fox v BT [2011] EWHC 1981 &#8211; ordering BT to block access to a website, Newzbin2 (www.newzbin.com), that was held in an earlier case to be infringing copyright on a large scale. Rick Shera and Lilian Edwards already have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/08/01/twentieth-century-fox-v-bt-the-newzbin2-website-blocking-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Convergence review invites submissions</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/04/28/convergence-review-invites-submissions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/04/28/convergence-review-invites-submissions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 02:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=1040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Australian government&#8217;s Convergence Review Committee has released a Framing Paper and invited public submissions on what principles should guide the review over the next year. The principles currently proposed span across broadcasting, telecommunications, and radiocommunication issues (although the bias is towards broadcasting content issues): 1. Australians should have access to a diversity of voices, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/04/28/convergence-review-invites-submissions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Convergence review terms of reference announced</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/02/convergence-review-terms-of-reference-announced/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/02/convergence-review-terms-of-reference-announced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 02:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The final terms of reference for the upcoming Convergence Review to be conducted by the Australian government have been announced, following on the draft terms of reference provided for public comment in December. At the Australian Broadcasting Summit this morning, Senator Stephen Conroy, the Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Ditital Economy, noted that the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/02/convergence-review-terms-of-reference-announced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attorney-General announces Australia&#8217;s Copyright Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/02/25/attorney-general-announces-australias-copyright-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/02/25/attorney-general-announces-australias-copyright-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 06:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, at a (invitation only) conference in Sydney, Australia&#8217;s Attorney-General Robert McClelland announced Australia&#8217;s copyright reform agenda for the next little while. I wasn&#8217;t there, but a transcript of the speech is here. In short, the agenda is this: On the issues in iinet, the AG believes that &#8216;an industry dialogue on this issue is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/02/25/attorney-general-announces-australias-copyright-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Draft terms of reference for Australian &#8220;convergence&#8221; review released</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2010/12/16/draft-terms-of-reference-for-australian-convergence-review-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2010/12/16/draft-terms-of-reference-for-australian-convergence-review-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 01:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The draft Terms of Reference for the Government&#8217;s review of the laws relating to the converged media and communications industry have been published. Part of a FAQ on the website of the Department for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, which is conducting the review, notes that: * &#8216;Convergence&#8217; describes the trend whereby devices (such [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2010/12/16/draft-terms-of-reference-for-australian-convergence-review-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on ACTA</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/12/more-on-acta-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/12/more-on-acta-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All jurisdictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few more news stories on ACTA including one from the ABC. Perhaps more interesting (not for what it says, but how it says it) is DFAT&#8217;s latest update on the negotiations. First, there&#8217;s this: A variety of groups have shown their interest in getting more information on the substance of the negotiations and have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/12/more-on-acta-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IceTV &#8211; appeal allowed &#8211; open thread!</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/04/22/icetv-appeal-allowed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/04/22/icetv-appeal-allowed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[more analysis later. updated: judgment now available on AustLII. Further update: commentary will have to wait until after my classes today. But please consider this an open thread for any discussion! Further Further Update: Warwick Rothnie has some very interesting thoughts on the case here. He&#8217;s certainly right about one thing. There&#8217;s a heckuva lot [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/04/22/icetv-appeal-allowed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why iiNet?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/24/why-iinet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/24/why-iinet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 22:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ZDNet has some interesting discussion of different ISPs&#8217; policies.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/24/why-iinet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Case Against iiNet (updated/reworded a little)</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/21/the-case-against-iinet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/21/the-case-against-iinet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I noted yesterday, a legal action has been launched by some 34 applicants from the television and movie industry against Australian ISP iiNet, alleging that iiNet has authorised copyright infringement by failing to take (adequate) steps to prevent sharing and downloading of films and TV shows via protocols like BitTorrent. A kind little birdie [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/21/the-case-against-iinet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawsuit filed against Australian ISP</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/20/lawsuit-filed-against-australian-isp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/20/lawsuit-filed-against-australian-isp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 05:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve been expecting this might happen for a while. Now it has. From the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft media release: &#8220;Today, seven leading film companies and their affiliates and licensees filed a legal action against iiNet, a major Australian internet service provider. The action was filed by Village Roadshow, Universal Pictures, Warner Bros Entertainment, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/20/lawsuit-filed-against-australian-isp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

