<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LawFont.com &#187; p2p</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawfont.com/category/tech/p2p/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawfont.com</link>
	<description>an analysis of law, technology, economics, and policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:57:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A few thoughts on iiNet FFC decision</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/02/a-few-thoughts-on-iinet-ffc-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/02/a-few-thoughts-on-iinet-ffc-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By now, all the copyright nerds in the world know the headlines: the Full Federal Court has handed down its decision in the iiNet case; that the appeal was dismissed in a 2:1 decision (Emmett and Nicholas JJ; Jagot J dissenting). Most people also will know that the reasoning is very, very different from the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/02/a-few-thoughts-on-iinet-ffc-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attorney-General announces Australia&#8217;s Copyright Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/02/25/attorney-general-announces-australias-copyright-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/02/25/attorney-general-announces-australias-copyright-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 06:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, at a (invitation only) conference in Sydney, Australia&#8217;s Attorney-General Robert McClelland announced Australia&#8217;s copyright reform agenda for the next little while. I wasn&#8217;t there, but a transcript of the speech is here. In short, the agenda is this: On the issues in iinet, the AG believes that &#8216;an industry dialogue on this issue is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/02/25/attorney-general-announces-australias-copyright-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why iiNet?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/24/why-iinet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/24/why-iinet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 22:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ZDNet has some interesting discussion of different ISPs&#8217; policies.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/24/why-iinet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Case Against iiNet (updated/reworded a little)</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/21/the-case-against-iinet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/21/the-case-against-iinet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I noted yesterday, a legal action has been launched by some 34 applicants from the television and movie industry against Australian ISP iiNet, alleging that iiNet has authorised copyright infringement by failing to take (adequate) steps to prevent sharing and downloading of films and TV shows via protocols like BitTorrent. A kind little birdie [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/21/the-case-against-iinet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawsuit filed against Australian ISP</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/20/lawsuit-filed-against-australian-isp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/20/lawsuit-filed-against-australian-isp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 05:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve been expecting this might happen for a while. Now it has. From the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft media release: &#8220;Today, seven leading film companies and their affiliates and licensees filed a legal action against iiNet, a major Australian internet service provider. The action was filed by Village Roadshow, Universal Pictures, Warner Bros Entertainment, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/20/lawsuit-filed-against-australian-isp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ISP-level internet content filtering &#8211; the report</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/08/04/isp-level-internet-content-filtering-the-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/08/04/isp-level-internet-content-filtering-the-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP/IT Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 28 July, the Australian Communications and Media Authority released its report which sets out the findings of the closed environment testing of ISP-level filters conducted in 2008. The Closed Environment testing report followed hot on the heels of the Developments in Internet Filtering Technologies and Other Measures for Promoting Online Safety report released in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/08/04/isp-level-internet-content-filtering-the-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACTA &#8211; A Statement of Principles for Australian Negotiators</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/07/29/acta-a-statement-of-principles-for-australian-negotiators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/07/29/acta-a-statement-of-principles-for-australian-negotiators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Internet Industry Association, CHOICE (the Australian Consumers&#8217; Association), the Australian Library and Information Association (ALIA) and Australian Digital Alliance (ADA) have today expressed their concern about the possible contents of the ACTA negotiations that I&#8217;ve discussed a few times (most recently here). They have also agreed a set of six principles which, in their [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/07/29/acta-a-statement-of-principles-for-australian-negotiators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More detail emerges on the UK &#8216;three strikes&#8217; type scheme</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/07/25/more-detail-on-the-uk-scheme/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/07/25/more-detail-on-the-uk-scheme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More detail has now emerged on &#8216;three-strikes&#8217; developments in the UK. &#8216;Three strikes&#8217; refers to proposals currently doing the rounds &#8211; heavily pushed by various IP rights-owning organisations &#8211; to have ISPs monitor online copyright infringement (particularly P2P), warn users, and, if infringement persists, impose sanctions such as termination of service. The French have been [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/07/25/more-detail-on-the-uk-scheme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK to announce three-strikes scheme for &#8216;curbing&#8217; downloaders&#8217; internet access</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/07/24/uk-three-strikes-scheme/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/07/24/uk-three-strikes-scheme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Times today is reporting that &#8216;[p]arents whose children download music and films illegally will be blacklisted and have their internet access curbed under government reforms to fight online piracy&#8217;. According to the report: The measures, the first of their kind in the world, will be announced today by Baroness Vadera, who brokered the deal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/07/24/uk-three-strikes-scheme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Notice and terminate/three strikes/here we go again</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/02/18/notice-and-terminatethree-strikeshere-we-go-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/02/18/notice-and-terminatethree-strikeshere-we-go-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2008/02/18/notice-and-terminatethree-strikeshere-we-go-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several people have pointed out to me that according to the SMH, like the UK government, [t]he Rudd Government is considering a three-strikes policy against computer users who download songs illegally. According to the SMH, The Government will examine new legislative proposals being unveiled in Britain this week to target people who download films and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/02/18/notice-and-terminatethree-strikeshere-we-go-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

