<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LawFont.com &#187; Tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawfont.com/category/tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawfont.com</link>
	<description>an analysis of law, technology, economics, and policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:57:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twentieth Century Fox v BT (the Newzbin2 website blocking decision)</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/08/01/twentieth-century-fox-v-bt-the-newzbin2-website-blocking-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/08/01/twentieth-century-fox-v-bt-the-newzbin2-website-blocking-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=1056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Late last week Justice Arnold in the UK High Court issued his judgment in Twentieth Century Fox v BT [2011] EWHC 1981 &#8211; ordering BT to block access to a website, Newzbin2 (www.newzbin.com), that was held in an earlier case to be infringing copyright on a large scale. Rick Shera and Lilian Edwards already have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/08/01/twentieth-century-fox-v-bt-the-newzbin2-website-blocking-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Convergence review invites submissions</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/04/28/convergence-review-invites-submissions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/04/28/convergence-review-invites-submissions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 02:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=1040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Australian government&#8217;s Convergence Review Committee has released a Framing Paper and invited public submissions on what principles should guide the review over the next year. The principles currently proposed span across broadcasting, telecommunications, and radiocommunication issues (although the bias is towards broadcasting content issues): 1. Australians should have access to a diversity of voices, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/04/28/convergence-review-invites-submissions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube&#8217;s Copyright school: will it prevent infringement?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/04/15/copyright-school-will-it-prevent-digital-copyright-infringement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/04/15/copyright-school-will-it-prevent-digital-copyright-infringement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 05:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=1024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the problems with enforcing copyright in the digital environment is that there is a seemingly infinite amount of content online, free for the taking (if you don&#8217;t count broadband internet fees). As a result, it has often been difficult for content owners to convince everyone that downloading content that is easily available&#8211;but copyrighted&#8211;is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/04/15/copyright-school-will-it-prevent-digital-copyright-infringement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The French Republic v Weiler: further details</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/04/the-french-republic-v-weiler-further-details/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/04/the-french-republic-v-weiler-further-details/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Professor Joseph Weiler has now written about the judgment in the criminal libel case brought against him in a French court. A decision was handed down by the Tribunal de Grand Instance de Paris on 3 March 2011. The details of the matter are outlined in an earlier post. In short, Professor Weiler was sued [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/04/the-french-republic-v-weiler-further-details/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Journal editor wins defamation action in French court</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/04/journal-editor-wins-defamation-action-in-french-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/04/journal-editor-wins-defamation-action-in-french-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 23:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Professor Joseph Weiler has won the defamation action brought against him in a French court, which I discussed last month here. So far I have not been able to find any more details about the ruling, but once I do will write a longer post.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/04/journal-editor-wins-defamation-action-in-french-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A few thoughts on iiNet FFC decision</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/02/a-few-thoughts-on-iinet-ffc-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/02/a-few-thoughts-on-iinet-ffc-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By now, all the copyright nerds in the world know the headlines: the Full Federal Court has handed down its decision in the iiNet case; that the appeal was dismissed in a 2:1 decision (Emmett and Nicholas JJ; Jagot J dissenting). Most people also will know that the reasoning is very, very different from the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/02/a-few-thoughts-on-iinet-ffc-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Convergence review terms of reference announced</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/02/convergence-review-terms-of-reference-announced/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/02/convergence-review-terms-of-reference-announced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 02:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The final terms of reference for the upcoming Convergence Review to be conducted by the Australian government have been announced, following on the draft terms of reference provided for public comment in December. At the Australian Broadcasting Summit this morning, Senator Stephen Conroy, the Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Ditital Economy, noted that the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/02/convergence-review-terms-of-reference-announced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attorney-General announces Australia&#8217;s Copyright Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/02/25/attorney-general-announces-australias-copyright-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/02/25/attorney-general-announces-australias-copyright-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 06:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, at a (invitation only) conference in Sydney, Australia&#8217;s Attorney-General Robert McClelland announced Australia&#8217;s copyright reform agenda for the next little while. I wasn&#8217;t there, but a transcript of the speech is here. In short, the agenda is this: On the issues in iinet, the AG believes that &#8216;an industry dialogue on this issue is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/02/25/attorney-general-announces-australias-copyright-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critical analysis or defamation?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/02/22/critical-analysis-or-defamation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/02/22/critical-analysis-or-defamation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 05:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the line between academic criticism of a work and defamatory statements about the author? A French court is currently considering this issue. In 2007, a book review website, www.globallawbooks.org, published a review of a book by Dr. Karin N. Calvo-Goller about the International Crimimal Court. The review, written by Professor Thomas Weigend, then [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/02/22/critical-analysis-or-defamation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Egyptian government shuts down the Internet&#8212;nearly</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/01/28/egyptian-government-shuts-down-the-internet-nearly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/01/28/egyptian-government-shuts-down-the-internet-nearly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only hours before major planned protests on Friday morning (28 January), the Egyptian government has shut down virtually all Internet access going in and out of Egypt, as well as SMS and Blackberry access. It seems that access to social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter may have taken place as early as Tuesday. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/01/28/egyptian-government-shuts-down-the-internet-nearly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

