<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LawFont.com &#187; DRM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawfont.com/category/tech/drm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawfont.com</link>
	<description>an analysis of law, technology, economics, and policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:57:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Attorney-General announces Australia&#8217;s Copyright Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/02/25/attorney-general-announces-australias-copyright-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/02/25/attorney-general-announces-australias-copyright-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 06:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, at a (invitation only) conference in Sydney, Australia&#8217;s Attorney-General Robert McClelland announced Australia&#8217;s copyright reform agenda for the next little while. I wasn&#8217;t there, but a transcript of the speech is here. In short, the agenda is this: On the issues in iinet, the AG believes that &#8216;an industry dialogue on this issue is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/02/25/attorney-general-announces-australias-copyright-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patry on US copyright bullying</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/02/14/patry-on-us-copyright-bullying/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/02/14/patry-on-us-copyright-bullying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2008/02/14/patry-on-us-copyright-bullying/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Patry today has an interesting post on the politics of the current Canadian copyright reform discussion, noting, in particular, the &#8216;bullying&#8217; of the &#8216;International&#8217; Intellectual Property Alliance (International in the same way as World Series Baseball, by the way, as Patry points out). Bill&#8217;s final point is, I think, a good one: The intense, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/02/14/patry-on-us-copyright-bullying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Major Baseball League and the defunct DRM</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/11/09/the-major-baseball-league-and-the-defunct-drm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/11/09/the-major-baseball-league-and-the-defunct-drm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2007/11/09/the-major-baseball-league-and-the-defunct-drm/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It must be Friday. All the IP stories are sports ones. Several sites have picked up the story that the Major Baseball League is involved in a rather Major Technology Stuff-up. As Madisonian reports: &#8216;Apparently fans who purchased digital downloads from MLB have discovered that MLB has changed its DRM scheme. Fans who downloaded complete [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/11/09/the-major-baseball-league-and-the-defunct-drm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review of the Legal Deposit Scheme &#8211; more info</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/11/02/review-of-the-legal-deposit-scheme-more-info/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/11/02/review-of-the-legal-deposit-scheme-more-info/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2007/11/02/review-of-the-legal-deposit-scheme-more-info/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The other day I mentioned the government&#8217;s Discussion Paper reviewing the Legal Deposit Scheme. Michael Geist has pointed out to me that related debates &#8211; in particular about the relationship between legal deposit and TPMs &#8211; have occurred in Canada. So, for your further edification: Michael Geist&#8217;s column on the issue; The regulations The LAC [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/11/02/review-of-the-legal-deposit-scheme-more-info/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright all over the common law world&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/12/14/copyright-all-over-the-common-law-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/12/14/copyright-all-over-the-common-law-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2006/12/14/copyright-all-over-the-common-law-world/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Note: the TPM part of this post has been updated, 15 December 2006] So, let&#8217;s see: Australia has passed a copyright amendment bill, with lots of changes, particularly digital ones; The UK has the Gowers Review Report, newly released &#8211; with various proposed changes for consideration; Canada is still waiting, and &#8230; (wait for it, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/12/14/copyright-all-over-the-common-law-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gowers Report &#8211; the commentary, the Oz commentary</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/12/07/gowers-report-the-commentary-the-oz-commentary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/12/07/gowers-report-the-commentary-the-oz-commentary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 01:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2006/12/07/gowers-report-the-commentary-the-oz-commentary/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, the final report of the Gowers Review of Intellectual Property has been released. The 140+ page report can be downloaded from here. This is a big deal for the UK &#8211; a wholesale review of the efficiency and effectiveness of the whole UK IP system &#8211; albeit it has been easy to ignore the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/12/07/gowers-report-the-commentary-the-oz-commentary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DRM is dead (again)</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/11/24/drm-is-dead-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/11/24/drm-is-dead-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2006/11/24/drm-is-dead-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fascinating quote from Paul Birch, who is a member of the exec committee and main board of the International Federation of Phonographic Institutes (IFPI) as well as the BPI Council and Chairs International: DRM as we know it is over. There may be Son of DRM but thatâ€™s another matter. Right now its dead, the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/11/24/drm-is-dead-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DMCA Rulemaking &#8211; new US exceptions, and how do they compare to us here in Oz?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/11/23/dmca-rulemaking-new-us-exceptions-and-how-do-they-compare-to-us-here-in-oz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/11/23/dmca-rulemaking-new-us-exceptions-and-how-do-they-compare-to-us-here-in-oz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2006/11/23/dmca-rulemaking-new-us-exceptions-and-how-do-they-compare-to-us-here-in-oz/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s always interesting when, simultaneously with law reform here, something happens overseas. At the moment, Australia is drafting its own OzDMCA. The Bill is due to pass Parliament next week. Australia has drafted a series of legislative exceptions to the laws that ban people from &#8216;hacking&#8217; (circumventing) DRM (technology used by copyright owners to prevent [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/11/23/dmca-rulemaking-new-us-exceptions-and-how-do-they-compare-to-us-here-in-oz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright Amendment Bill listed for hearing</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/11/22/copyright-amendment-bill-listed-for-hearing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/11/22/copyright-amendment-bill-listed-for-hearing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2006/11/22/copyright-amendment-bill-listed-for-hearing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For all of you who have been asking, I can now confirm: the Australian Copyright Amendment Bill has been listed for debate in Parliament next Wednesday, 29 November 2006.Â Â  So I guess sometime between now and then we&#8217;ll see if they&#8217;ve made any amendments.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/11/22/copyright-amendment-bill-listed-for-hearing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Committee Reports; Copyright hits Seven News and SMH Front Page</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/11/14/senate-committee-reports-copyright-hits-seven-news-and-smh-front-page/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/11/14/senate-committee-reports-copyright-hits-seven-news-and-smh-front-page/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 00:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2006/11/14/senate-committee-reports-copyright-hits-seven-news-and-smh-front-page/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Final Report of the Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs on the Copyright Amendment Bill has now been tabled. The parties were unable to reach a consensus report: we have a majority report (ie, Liberal), a Labor Supplementary Report and Dissenting Comments from the Australian Democrats (Senator Bartlett). Majority recommendations, and a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/11/14/senate-committee-reports-copyright-hits-seven-news-and-smh-front-page/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

