<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LawFont.com &#187; national security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawfont.com/category/national-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawfont.com</link>
	<description>an analysis of law, technology, economics, and policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:57:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>die hard and still live free?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/10/24/die-hard-and-still-live-free/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/10/24/die-hard-and-still-live-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP/IT Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2007/10/24/die-hard-and-still-live-free/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the latest activity regarding communications related national security legislation brought to you courtesy of the Senate Bills List dated 15 October&#8230; Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Amendment (Terrorist Material) Bill 2007:Amends the Classification, (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Act 1995 to require publications, films or computer games that promote terrorist activity to be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/10/24/die-hard-and-still-live-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telecommunications (Interception and Access)Amendment Bill 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/09/26/telecommunications-interception-and-accessamendment-bill-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/09/26/telecommunications-interception-and-accessamendment-bill-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2007/09/26/telecommunications-interception-and-accessamendment-bill-2007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Further to my previous posts, the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Bill 2007 was passed by the Senate on 20 September 2007. It went through without a definition of &#8216;telecommunications data&#8217;. The Democrats and the Greens expressed their concerns about the bill generally and its impact on privacy and the vagueness of the term &#8216;telecommunications [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/09/26/telecommunications-interception-and-accessamendment-bill-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Communications Legislation Amendment (Crime or Terrorism Related Internet Content) Bill 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/09/26/communications-legislation-amendment-crime-or-terrorism-related-internet-content-bill-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/09/26/communications-legislation-amendment-crime-or-terrorism-related-internet-content-bill-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP/IT Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2007/09/26/communications-legislation-amendment-crime-or-terrorism-related-internet-content-bill-2007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Communications Legislation Amendment (Crime or Terrorism Related Internet Content) Bill 2007 was introduced into the Senate at the beginning of this week. Senator Eric Abetz had this to say in his Second Reading Speech: &#8220;The Government&#8217;s recent review of the E-Security National Agenda found that the e-security landscape has changed significantly with the emergence [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/09/26/communications-legislation-amendment-crime-or-terrorism-related-internet-content-bill-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>you say data, i say data&#8230;Telco Intercept Amendment Bill introduced into the Senate&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/08/29/you-say-data-i-say-datatelco-intercept-amendment-bill-introduced-into-the-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/08/29/you-say-data-i-say-datatelco-intercept-amendment-bill-introduced-into-the-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 02:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP/IT Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2007/08/29/you-say-data-i-say-datatelco-intercept-amendment-bill-introduced-into-the-senate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee report on the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Bill 2007 was tabled in parliament on 7 August. Get the report here. The legislation was intoduced into the Senate on 16 August 2007. Given the changes that this Bill introduces to the current arrangements for interception capability, and access to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/08/29/you-say-data-i-say-datatelco-intercept-amendment-bill-introduced-into-the-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;sometimes words have two meanings&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/07/26/sometimes-words-have-two-meanings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/07/26/sometimes-words-have-two-meanings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2007/07/26/sometimes-words-have-two-meanings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The â€˜war on terrorâ€™ has created the conditions for a new era of content regulation in the form of censorship of film and literature, broadcasting content standards and restrictions on the media in respect of national security matters. This week David Marr commented on the Attorney-General&#8217;s recent daubing (sorry I am sticking with the &#8220;unifinished [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/07/26/sometimes-words-have-two-meanings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;national security&#8217; is a tech law issue&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/07/18/national-security-is-a-tech-law-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/07/18/national-security-is-a-tech-law-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2007/07/18/national-security-is-a-tech-law-issue/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following on from Kim&#8217;s last post, if there was ever a time when national security and anti- terrorism legislation wasn&#8217;t a tech-law issue, that time has passed. The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Bill 2007 is currently before a Senate Committee. There are 26 submissions . The industry will have to get its head around [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/07/18/national-security-is-a-tech-law-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>the usefulness of a metaphor&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/06/15/the-usefulness-of-a-metaphor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/06/15/the-usefulness-of-a-metaphor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2007/06/15/the-usefulness-of-a-metaphor/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in 2005, the Commonwealth Attorney-General described the national security legislative framework as an â€˜unfinished canvasâ€™. The â€˜unfinished canvasâ€™ metaphor still has currency. Why? Because it&#8217;s still not finished. See the latest (courtesy of the Bills&#8217; List of the Senate). Not quite the Ben Quilty style strokes of the 2005 canvas&#8230;perhaps a little more in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/06/15/the-usefulness-of-a-metaphor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>despite global warming, it&#8217;s getting a little chilly in here&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/06/01/despite-global-warming-its-getting-a-little-chilly-in-here/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/06/01/despite-global-warming-its-getting-a-little-chilly-in-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 05:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2007/06/01/despite-global-warming-its-getting-a-little-chilly-in-here/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s been quite a bit of activity over the past few weeks with respect to Australian press freedom and the impact of the anti-terrorism legislation passed back in 2005. Fairfax&#8217;s Chairman, David Kirk, recently addressed the Australian Press Council. Mr Kirk had quite a bit to say, including announcing that Fairfax will join News Ltd, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/06/01/despite-global-warming-its-getting-a-little-chilly-in-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

