<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LawFont.com &#187; IP/IT Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawfont.com/category/ipit-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawfont.com</link>
	<description>an analysis of law, technology, economics, and policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:35:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>ISP-level internet content filtering &#8211; the report</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/08/04/isp-level-internet-content-filtering-the-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/08/04/isp-level-internet-content-filtering-the-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP/IT Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 28 July, the Australian Communications and Media Authority released its report which sets out the findings of the closed environment testing of ISP-level filters conducted in 2008. The Closed Environment testing report followed hot on the heels of the Developments in Internet Filtering Technologies and Other Measures for Promoting Online Safety report released in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/08/04/isp-level-internet-content-filtering-the-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogroll additions</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/10/28/blogroll-additions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/10/28/blogroll-additions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 06:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IP/IT Blogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2007/10/28/blogroll-additions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the spirit of &#8216;adding links to blogs that readers of this one might be interested in&#8217;: a couple of additions:

House of Commons: blog by several students at UNSW who are part of the Unlocking IP project.  Interested generally in Australian copyright law, technologies of search, content licensing;
Malik&#8217;s Law: Alex Malik, interested in Australian [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/10/28/blogroll-additions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>die hard and still live free?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/10/24/die-hard-and-still-live-free/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/10/24/die-hard-and-still-live-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP/IT Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2007/10/24/die-hard-and-still-live-free/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the latest activity regarding communications related national security legislation brought to you courtesy of the Senate Bills List dated 15 October&#8230;

Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Amendment (Terrorist
Material) Bill 2007:Amends the Classification, (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Act 1995 to require publications, films or computer games that promote terrorist activity to be classified as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/10/24/die-hard-and-still-live-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Communications Legislation Amendment (Crime or Terrorism Related Internet Content) Bill 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/09/26/communications-legislation-amendment-crime-or-terrorism-related-internet-content-bill-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/09/26/communications-legislation-amendment-crime-or-terrorism-related-internet-content-bill-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP/IT Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2007/09/26/communications-legislation-amendment-crime-or-terrorism-related-internet-content-bill-2007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Communications Legislation Amendment (Crime or Terrorism Related Internet Content) Bill 2007 was introduced into the Senate at the beginning of this week. Senator Eric Abetz had this to say in his Second Reading Speech:
&#8220;The Government&#8217;s recent review of the E-Security National Agenda found that the e-security landscape has changed significantly with the emergence of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/09/26/communications-legislation-amendment-crime-or-terrorism-related-internet-content-bill-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>you say data, i say data&#8230;Telco Intercept Amendment Bill introduced into the Senate&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/08/29/you-say-data-i-say-datatelco-intercept-amendment-bill-introduced-into-the-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/08/29/you-say-data-i-say-datatelco-intercept-amendment-bill-introduced-into-the-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 02:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP/IT Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2007/08/29/you-say-data-i-say-datatelco-intercept-amendment-bill-introduced-into-the-senate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee report on the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Bill 2007 was tabled in parliament on 7 August. Get the report here. The legislation was intoduced into the Senate on 16 August 2007. Given the changes that this Bill introduces to the current arrangements for interception capability, and access to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/08/29/you-say-data-i-say-datatelco-intercept-amendment-bill-introduced-into-the-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
