<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LawFont.com &#187; Copyright</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawfont.com/category/ip/copyright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawfont.com</link>
	<description>an analysis of law, technology, economics, and policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:57:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twentieth Century Fox v BT (the Newzbin2 website blocking decision)</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/08/01/twentieth-century-fox-v-bt-the-newzbin2-website-blocking-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/08/01/twentieth-century-fox-v-bt-the-newzbin2-website-blocking-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=1056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Late last week Justice Arnold in the UK High Court issued his judgment in Twentieth Century Fox v BT [2011] EWHC 1981 &#8211; ordering BT to block access to a website, Newzbin2 (www.newzbin.com), that was held in an earlier case to be infringing copyright on a large scale. Rick Shera and Lilian Edwards already have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/08/01/twentieth-century-fox-v-bt-the-newzbin2-website-blocking-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube&#8217;s Copyright school: will it prevent infringement?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/04/15/copyright-school-will-it-prevent-digital-copyright-infringement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/04/15/copyright-school-will-it-prevent-digital-copyright-infringement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 05:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=1024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the problems with enforcing copyright in the digital environment is that there is a seemingly infinite amount of content online, free for the taking (if you don&#8217;t count broadband internet fees). As a result, it has often been difficult for content owners to convince everyone that downloading content that is easily available&#8211;but copyrighted&#8211;is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/04/15/copyright-school-will-it-prevent-digital-copyright-infringement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IP Australia &#8211; raising the bar?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/03/ip-australia-raising-the-bar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/03/ip-australia-raising-the-bar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 22:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Mark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IP Australia has released the IP Laws Amendment (Raising the Bar) Bill for public consultation. It&#8217;s huge: it covers patentability standards, a patent research exception; enforcement; oppositions &#8211; you name it, it&#8217;s in there. Written submissions due by 14 April 2011. More thoughts to come&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/03/ip-australia-raising-the-bar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A few thoughts on iiNet FFC decision</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/02/a-few-thoughts-on-iinet-ffc-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/02/a-few-thoughts-on-iinet-ffc-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By now, all the copyright nerds in the world know the headlines: the Full Federal Court has handed down its decision in the iiNet case; that the appeal was dismissed in a 2:1 decision (Emmett and Nicholas JJ; Jagot J dissenting). Most people also will know that the reasoning is very, very different from the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/02/a-few-thoughts-on-iinet-ffc-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Building the case for fair use in Australia &#8211; one specific exception at a time</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/01/building-the-case-for-fair-use-in-australia-one-specific-exception-at-a-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/01/building-the-case-for-fair-use-in-australia-one-specific-exception-at-a-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 05:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I noted the other day that the Attorney-General had set out the upcoming copyright reform agenda. And then an email alert crossed my desk &#8211; an actual copyright reform, in a dedicated Bill. Australia is to get a new copyright exception! Specifically, we are to get new s 44BA, for &#8216;acts done in relation to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/03/01/building-the-case-for-fair-use-in-australia-one-specific-exception-at-a-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attorney-General announces Australia&#8217;s Copyright Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/02/25/attorney-general-announces-australias-copyright-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/02/25/attorney-general-announces-australias-copyright-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 06:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, at a (invitation only) conference in Sydney, Australia&#8217;s Attorney-General Robert McClelland announced Australia&#8217;s copyright reform agenda for the next little while. I wasn&#8217;t there, but a transcript of the speech is here. In short, the agenda is this: On the issues in iinet, the AG believes that &#8216;an industry dialogue on this issue is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/02/25/attorney-general-announces-australias-copyright-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian Digital Alliance to hold a forum on copyright law</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/01/25/australian-digital-alliance-to-hold-a-forum-on-copyright-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/01/25/australian-digital-alliance-to-hold-a-forum-on-copyright-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Australian Digital Alliance will be holding a policy forum, titled &#8220;Righting the Copyright Balance&#8221;, on 4 March 2011 in Canberra. The full-day event looks to be a very interesting one, with sessions focusing on areas where Australian copyright law is thought to be most imbalanced between the rights of creators and users of copyright [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/01/25/australian-digital-alliance-to-hold-a-forum-on-copyright-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protectionism maintained</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/12/protectionism-maintained/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/12/protectionism-maintained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Minister for Innovation has decided to ignore the Productivity Commission&#8217;s recommendations, and not to change the Australian regulatory regime for books introduced by the previous Labor government. In other words, publishers get to keep their territorial exclusivity for books, and the government thinks we should all get e-Readers instead (seriously, that&#8217;s practically in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/12/protectionism-maintained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kookaburra sits in the courtroom</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/07/31/kookaburra-sits-in-the-courtroom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/07/31/kookaburra-sits-in-the-courtroom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have already been a few articles about the Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd v EMI Songs Australia Pty Limited case. The first thing to note is that the decision is just on a preliminary question. This is a procedural device used where it is likely to help save the court&#8217;s (and parties&#8217;) time and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/07/31/kookaburra-sits-in-the-courtroom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IceTV &#8211; appeal allowed &#8211; open thread!</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/04/22/icetv-appeal-allowed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/04/22/icetv-appeal-allowed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[more analysis later. updated: judgment now available on AustLII. Further update: commentary will have to wait until after my classes today. But please consider this an open thread for any discussion! Further Further Update: Warwick Rothnie has some very interesting thoughts on the case here. He&#8217;s certainly right about one thing. There&#8217;s a heckuva lot [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/04/22/icetv-appeal-allowed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

