<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LawFont.com &#187; Copyright</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawfont.com/category/ip/copyright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawfont.com</link>
	<description>an analysis of law, technology, economics, and policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:35:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Protectionism maintained</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/12/protectionism-maintained/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/12/protectionism-maintained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Minister for Innovation has decided to ignore the Productivity Commission&#8217;s recommendations, and not to change the Australian regulatory regime for books introduced by the previous Labor government. In other words, publishers get to keep their territorial exclusivity for books, and the government thinks we should all get e-Readers instead (seriously, that&#8217;s practically in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/12/protectionism-maintained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kookaburra sits in the courtroom</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/07/31/kookaburra-sits-in-the-courtroom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/07/31/kookaburra-sits-in-the-courtroom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have already been a few articles about the Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd v EMI Songs Australia Pty Limited case. 
The first thing to note is that the decision is just on a preliminary question. This is a procedural device used where it is likely to help save the court&#8217;s (and parties&#8217;) time and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/07/31/kookaburra-sits-in-the-courtroom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IceTV &#8211; appeal allowed &#8211; open thread!</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/04/22/icetv-appeal-allowed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/04/22/icetv-appeal-allowed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[more analysis later.
updated: judgment now available on AustLII.
Further update: commentary will have to wait until after my classes today. But please consider this an open thread for any discussion!
Further Further Update: Warwick Rothnie has some very interesting thoughts on the case here. He&#8217;s certainly right about one thing. There&#8217;s a heckuva lot of food for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/04/22/icetv-appeal-allowed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama campaign poster artist sues AP</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/02/10/obama-campaign-poster-artist-sues-ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/02/10/obama-campaign-poster-artist-sues-ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Artist Shepard Fairey, who created the &#8220;Hope&#8221; poster of now President Obama, has filed a pre-emptive law suit against the Associated Press. The suit, which has been filed in United States District Court in New York, seeks a declaratory judgement for Fairey ruling that the poster is protected by fair use and does not infringe [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/02/10/obama-campaign-poster-artist-sues-ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Register and Protect your creative work &#8230; by an Official Copyright&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/12/02/register-and-protect-your-creative-work-by-an-official-copyright/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/12/02/register-and-protect-your-creative-work-by-an-official-copyright/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does this site strike anyone else as, well, just a bit dodgy? &#8220;International validity for a lifetime&#8221;???
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/12/02/register-and-protect-your-creative-work-by-an-official-copyright/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why iiNet?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/24/why-iinet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/24/why-iinet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 22:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ZDNet has some interesting discussion of different ISPs&#8217; policies.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/24/why-iinet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Case Against iiNet (updated/reworded a little)</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/21/the-case-against-iinet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/21/the-case-against-iinet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I noted yesterday, a legal action has been launched by some 34 applicants from the television and movie industry against Australian ISP iiNet, alleging that iiNet has authorised copyright infringement by failing to take (adequate) steps to prevent sharing and downloading of films and TV shows via protocols like BitTorrent. A kind little birdie [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/21/the-case-against-iinet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Radio Silence and the new developments</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/20/radio-silence-and-the-new-developments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/20/radio-silence-and-the-new-developments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 05:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and all hell breaks loose, it seems. Sorry for the long radio silence: I&#8217;ve been on a research trip and not following things as closely as perhaps I should. A couple of general catch up notes:

I would blog about the Internet Censorship material &#8211; I simply can&#8217;t believe that the Australian government is seriously wanting [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/20/radio-silence-and-the-new-developments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawsuit filed against Australian ISP</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/20/lawsuit-filed-against-australian-isp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/20/lawsuit-filed-against-australian-isp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 05:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve been expecting this might happen for a while. Now it has. From the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft media release:
&#8220;Today, seven leading film companies and their affiliates and licensees filed a legal action against iiNet, a major Australian internet service provider. The action was filed by Village Roadshow, Universal Pictures, Warner Bros Entertainment, Paramount [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/20/lawsuit-filed-against-australian-isp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian government intends to introduce resale royalty right for visual art</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/10/23/australian-government-intends-to-introduce-resale-royalty-right-for-visual-art/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/10/23/australian-government-intends-to-introduce-resale-royalty-right-for-visual-art/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 05:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 3 October, Australian Arts Minister Peter Garrett announced that the Australian Federal Government plans to introduce a resale royalty right for works of visual art by 1 July 2009. This right will ensure that visual artists receive a portion of the proceeds from resales of their works. The legislation establishing the resale royalty right [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/10/23/australian-government-intends-to-introduce-resale-royalty-right-for-visual-art/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
