<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LawFont.com &#187; Broadcasting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawfont.com/category/broadcasting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawfont.com</link>
	<description>an analysis of law, technology, economics, and policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:35:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Podcasts, Webinars (next Friday!) and other ways to learn more about IP</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/02/24/podcasts-webinars-next-friday-and-other-ways-to-learn-more-about-ip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/02/24/podcasts-webinars-next-friday-and-other-ways-to-learn-more-about-ip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All jurisdictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve discovered podcasts. Yes, I know it&#8217;s a little late in the piece, but really, it&#8217;s been a pretty recent thing: since I (a) got an iPhone and (b) started walking to work every day. At half an hour each day, I get a lot of listening done and music doesn&#8217;t quite do it for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/02/24/podcasts-webinars-next-friday-and-other-ways-to-learn-more-about-ip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian Censorship Issue Event at UNSW next Thursday</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/21/australian-censorship-issue-event-at-unsw-next-thursday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/21/australian-censorship-issue-event-at-unsw-next-thursday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I mentioned yesterday the current debate over internet censorship in Australia. I should, at the same time, have mentioned a free event that UNSW&#8217;s Baker &#038; McKenzie Cyberspace Law and Policy Centre is having next Thursday. Full webpage here with speakers/program/etc. Here&#8217;s the short version:
The UNSW Cyberspace Law and Policy Centre is hosting a forum [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/11/21/australian-censorship-issue-event-at-unsw-next-thursday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IceTV granted special leave</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/08/26/icetv-granted-special-leave/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/08/26/icetv-granted-special-leave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You heard it first &#8230; everywhere else. I know. House of Commons has reported it, as have assiduous commenters on this blog.
But for those who didn&#8217;t know: IceTV has been granted special leave. More commentary from House of Commons here. My previous commentary here and here; Bill Patry here. For my money, read David Lindsay&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/08/26/icetv-granted-special-leave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on the IceTV judgment</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/05/12/more-on-the-icetv-judgment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/05/12/more-on-the-icetv-judgment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 22:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2008/05/12/more-on-the-icetv-judgment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following up from my long post on the case, some more comments and things on IceTV that are interesting:

This thread discussing the decision in the Digital TV Forum
This post on the case, with a reference to a really interesting paper by Kathy Bowrey on digital television and copyright;
The responding press release from IceTV (foreshadowing a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/05/12/more-on-the-icetv-judgment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All our program guides are belongs to us</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/05/09/all-our-program-guides-are-belongs-to-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/05/09/all-our-program-guides-are-belongs-to-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 23:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2008/05/09/all-our-program-guides-are-belongs-to-us/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I flagged yesterday, yesterday morning the appeal judgment in the IceTV case was handed down by the Full Federal Court.  This truly was an all-stars copyright case: interesting issues, an all-star IP bench (including the CJ himself, plus two senior IP heavies &#8211; Justices Lindgren and Sackville) (note too &#8211; the same bench [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/05/09/all-our-program-guides-are-belongs-to-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IceTV judgment handed down</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/05/08/icetv-judgment-handed-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/05/08/icetv-judgment-handed-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 08:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2008/05/08/icetv-judgment-handed-down/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick note: the Full Federal Court judgment in IceTV is now up on AustLII.  The case concerns the electronic program guide for television: Channel Nine sued a company which was providing the EPG for people wanting to make fully functional use of digital television recorders.  Background on the case here.
At first [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/05/08/icetv-judgment-handed-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cricket and IP &#8211; again</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/11/09/cricket-and-ip-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/11/09/cricket-and-ip-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2007/11/09/cricket-and-ip-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Malik reports, we&#8217;ve having the &#8220;we own all rights to all images of sport for all time&#8221; debate again.  
This time it&#8217;s cricket.  Cricket Australia has been in disputes with all kinds of media over its accreditation rules (the rules that you have to follow if you want to be on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/11/09/cricket-and-ip-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shameless Self-Promotion</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/11/01/shameless-self-promotion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/11/01/shameless-self-promotion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2007/11/01/shameless-self-promotion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a chapter in a new book.  The book is called TV Futures: Digital Television Policy in Australia.  Further information, contents and the first chapter are available at the CMCL-Centre for Media and Communications Law, University of Melbourne.  You can order the book here.  You can also find an abstract [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/11/01/shameless-self-promotion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Television Industry Code of Practice &#8211; Proposed Amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/08/16/television-industry-code-of-practice-proposed-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/08/16/television-industry-code-of-practice-proposed-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 05:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2007/08/16/television-industry-code-of-practice-proposed-amendment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The commercial FTA networks, through Free TV, are pushing for a change to the Commercial Television Code of Practice in advance of the imminent Federal election. The changes, which are the subject of public consultation, would allow the commercial FTAs to sell an additional minute of  political advertising&#8230;

The additional advertising will be broadcast between [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/08/16/television-industry-code-of-practice-proposed-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C7 judgment handed down this afternoon&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/07/27/c7-judgment-handed-down-this-afternoon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/07/27/c7-judgment-handed-down-this-afternoon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2007/07/27/c7-judgment-handed-down-this-afternoon/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The much anticipated judgment in the C7 matter has been handed down today&#8230;it&#8217;s a wopping 1230 pages/7MB. Get it here. In a very small nutshell, Channel 7 did not prove its pleaded case and was thus unsuccessful. The issue of costs is still to be worked out. His Honour Justice Sackville estimates costs in excess [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/07/27/c7-judgment-handed-down-this-afternoon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
