<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LawFont.com &#187; USA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawfont.com/category/all-jurisdictions/usa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawfont.com</link>
	<description>an analysis of law, technology, economics, and policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:57:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube&#8217;s Copyright school: will it prevent infringement?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/04/15/copyright-school-will-it-prevent-digital-copyright-infringement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/04/15/copyright-school-will-it-prevent-digital-copyright-infringement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 05:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=1024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the problems with enforcing copyright in the digital environment is that there is a seemingly infinite amount of content online, free for the taking (if you don&#8217;t count broadband internet fees). As a result, it has often been difficult for content owners to convince everyone that downloading content that is easily available&#8211;but copyrighted&#8211;is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2011/04/15/copyright-school-will-it-prevent-digital-copyright-infringement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rabbit ears make a comeback</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2010/12/08/rabbit-ears-make-a-comeback/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2010/12/08/rabbit-ears-make-a-comeback/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 06:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that digital television broadcasts in the United States are increasingly being received not via subscription television, but over the airwaves with the help of an old-style technology: rabbit ears. Viewers who are either unwilling or unable to pay for increasingly expensive cable or satellite television are turning to free-to-air television, with the help [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2010/12/08/rabbit-ears-make-a-comeback/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Manufacturing Generic Pharmaceuticals in Australia?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/04/30/manufacturing-generic-pharmaceuticals-in-australia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/04/30/manufacturing-generic-pharmaceuticals-in-australia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was interested, the other day, to see this Online Opinion article by Nick Gruen (Club Troppo) on Australia&#8217;s pharmaceutical industry and the idea of manufacturing generics for export. The basic point of in Nick&#8217;s post is that investment in the manufacture of generic biologics in Australia is being prevented by Australian patent law and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/04/30/manufacturing-generic-pharmaceuticals-in-australia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is interesting news: CSIRO wins settlement of wifi patent case in US</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/04/23/this-is-interesting-news-csiro-wins-settlement-of-wifi-patent-case-in-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/04/23/this-is-interesting-news-csiro-wins-settlement-of-wifi-patent-case-in-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 02:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SMH has the story here.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/04/23/this-is-interesting-news-csiro-wins-settlement-of-wifi-patent-case-in-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama campaign poster artist sues AP</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/02/10/obama-campaign-poster-artist-sues-ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/02/10/obama-campaign-poster-artist-sues-ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Artist Shepard Fairey, who created the &#8220;Hope&#8221; poster of now President Obama, has filed a pre-emptive law suit against the Associated Press. The suit, which has been filed in United States District Court in New York, seeks a declaratory judgement for Fairey ruling that the poster is protected by fair use and does not infringe [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/02/10/obama-campaign-poster-artist-sues-ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent term extensions</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/03/20/patent-term-extensions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/03/20/patent-term-extensions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2008/03/20/patent-term-extensions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I could never work out why the US Free Trade Agreements included a provision on patent term extension for &#8216;unreasonable delays&#8217; in the patent office (see, eg, Australia-US Free Trade Agreement Art 17.9.8). I figured there must be delays in some of the developing world countries they negotiate with. Now I understand why &#8211; according [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/03/20/patent-term-extensions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New and interesting Patent Stats comparing USPTO, JPO, EPO and Australian Patent Office</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/02/29/new-and-interesting-patent-stats-comparing-uspto-jpo-epo-and-australian-patent-office/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/02/29/new-and-interesting-patent-stats-comparing-uspto-jpo-epo-and-australian-patent-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2008/02/29/new-and-interesting-patent-stats-comparing-uspto-jpo-epo-and-australian-patent-office/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some colleagues of mine (Paul H. Jensen, Alfons Palangkaraya and Elizabeth Webster), from the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, have published a new Working Paper that would be of interest to people who, like me, are fascinated by international dynamics in patenting. The paper is called &#8216;Application pendency times and outcomes across [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/02/29/new-and-interesting-patent-stats-comparing-uspto-jpo-epo-and-australian-patent-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patry on US copyright bullying</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/02/14/patry-on-us-copyright-bullying/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/02/14/patry-on-us-copyright-bullying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2008/02/14/patry-on-us-copyright-bullying/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Patry today has an interesting post on the politics of the current Canadian copyright reform discussion, noting, in particular, the &#8216;bullying&#8217; of the &#8216;International&#8217; Intellectual Property Alliance (International in the same way as World Series Baseball, by the way, as Patry points out). Bill&#8217;s final point is, I think, a good one: The intense, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/02/14/patry-on-us-copyright-bullying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Major Baseball League and the defunct DRM</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/11/09/the-major-baseball-league-and-the-defunct-drm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/11/09/the-major-baseball-league-and-the-defunct-drm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2007/11/09/the-major-baseball-league-and-the-defunct-drm/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It must be Friday. All the IP stories are sports ones. Several sites have picked up the story that the Major Baseball League is involved in a rather Major Technology Stuff-up. As Madisonian reports: &#8216;Apparently fans who purchased digital downloads from MLB have discovered that MLB has changed its DRM scheme. Fans who downloaded complete [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/11/09/the-major-baseball-league-and-the-defunct-drm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A compendium of patent office cooperation &#8211; and some thoughts [updated]</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/10/29/a-compendium-of-patent-office-cooperation-and-some-thoughts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/10/29/a-compendium-of-patent-office-cooperation-and-some-thoughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2007/10/29/a-compendium-of-patent-office-cooperation-and-some-thoughts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve become more interested in copyright bureaucracies, and patent and trade mark offices: how they operate; how transparent they are; who they are; how powers are divided between them; how they interact; how they characterise their role, their &#8216;customers&#8217;, and their &#8216;stakeholders&#8217;. How we make them accountable for the decisions they make &#8211; or how [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawfont.com/2007/10/29/a-compendium-of-patent-office-cooperation-and-some-thoughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

