<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACTA: here we go again?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/04/acta-here-we-go-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/04/acta-here-we-go-again/</link>
	<description>an analysis of law, technology, economics, and policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:51:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: p</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/04/acta-here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-56182</link>
		<dc:creator>p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=792#comment-56182</guid>
		<description>ISPs should be held accountable because they facilitate file sharing by carrying information.
Microsoft facilitates they provide the operational sytem.
Intel for the processor.
Sony for camcorders.

You are allowed to think this does not make sense.
It is not the one that cares information that should be held accountable.

What about all that information that ISPs carry? Interesting.
I would love to control that. But first, I would try to invent a good excuse.

I want names.

None of what I read gave me names, except here:

White House shares the ACTA Internet text with 42 Washington insiders, under non disclosure agreements
http://keionline.org/node/660

No names, a lure, and lots of people speaking about what they can&#039;t see and don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ISPs should be held accountable because they facilitate file sharing by carrying information.<br />
Microsoft facilitates they provide the operational sytem.<br />
Intel for the processor.<br />
Sony for camcorders.</p>
<p>You are allowed to think this does not make sense.<br />
It is not the one that cares information that should be held accountable.</p>
<p>What about all that information that ISPs carry? Interesting.<br />
I would love to control that. But first, I would try to invent a good excuse.</p>
<p>I want names.</p>
<p>None of what I read gave me names, except here:</p>
<p>White House shares the ACTA Internet text with 42 Washington insiders, under non disclosure agreements<br />
<a href="http://keionline.org/node/660" rel="nofollow">http://keionline.org/node/660</a></p>
<p>No names, a lure, and lots of people speaking about what they can&#8217;t see and don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/11/04/acta-here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-56181</link>
		<dc:creator>jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=792#comment-56181</guid>
		<description>-appreciate the info. ACTA, new to me 

-disturbing to ponder and speculate. yikes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-appreciate the info. ACTA, new to me </p>
<p>-disturbing to ponder and speculate. yikes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
