<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama campaign poster artist sues AP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawfont.com/2009/02/10/obama-campaign-poster-artist-sues-ap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/02/10/obama-campaign-poster-artist-sues-ap/</link>
	<description>an analysis of law, technology, economics, and policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:59:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jovan</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/02/10/obama-campaign-poster-artist-sues-ap/comment-page-1/#comment-56559</link>
		<dc:creator>jovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 01:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=741#comment-56559</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that we are viewing the artist&#039;s take on AP picture. Doesn&#039;t trick the average person into thinking its the same thing. This is an entirely new work. What a historically important picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that we are viewing the artist&#8217;s take on AP picture. Doesn&#8217;t trick the average person into thinking its the same thing. This is an entirely new work. What a historically important picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/02/10/obama-campaign-poster-artist-sues-ap/comment-page-1/#comment-56149</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 08:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=741#comment-56149</guid>
		<description>RE: Andy Warhol... See original Studio Promotional photo at http://planetgroupentertainment.squarespace.com/storage/MarilynStudioPhoto_SF20444.jpg - now copyright Bettman/Corbis.  Draw your own conclusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Andy Warhol&#8230; See original Studio Promotional photo at <a href="http://planetgroupentertainment.squarespace.com/storage/MarilynStudioPhoto_SF20444.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://planetgroupentertainment.squarespace.com/storage/MarilynStudioPhoto_SF20444.jpg</a> &#8211; now copyright Bettman/Corbis.  Draw your own conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/02/10/obama-campaign-poster-artist-sues-ap/comment-page-1/#comment-56063</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=741#comment-56063</guid>
		<description>but for what, Samantha? Most of what he worked with was trade mark material - eg Campbell Soup Can type stuff - in that case the rules are different (you are only liable for &#039;trade mark use&#039; that is use in the course of trade. Don&#039;t think his art would have counted. I guess there were some photos he worked with - there was for example that photo of the electric chair that he repeatedly re-interpreted. Whichever way you look at it that was political comment. 
Fairey&#039;s use of the Obama image doesn&#039;t fall into that category. That said, I think there are good arguments that what Fairey copied was arguably not a substantial part of what copyright protects in a photograph - ie the photographer&#039;s skill. cf Bauman v Fussell (very old case about a painter who re-did a photo of a cockfight as a painting. No infringement...).
Anyway. Interesting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but for what, Samantha? Most of what he worked with was trade mark material &#8211; eg Campbell Soup Can type stuff &#8211; in that case the rules are different (you are only liable for &#8216;trade mark use&#8217; that is use in the course of trade. Don&#8217;t think his art would have counted. I guess there were some photos he worked with &#8211; there was for example that photo of the electric chair that he repeatedly re-interpreted. Whichever way you look at it that was political comment.<br />
Fairey&#8217;s use of the Obama image doesn&#8217;t fall into that category. That said, I think there are good arguments that what Fairey copied was arguably not a substantial part of what copyright protects in a photograph &#8211; ie the photographer&#8217;s skill. cf Bauman v Fussell (very old case about a painter who re-did a photo of a cockfight as a painting. No infringement&#8230;).<br />
Anyway. Interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/02/10/obama-campaign-poster-artist-sues-ap/comment-page-1/#comment-56061</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=741#comment-56061</guid>
		<description>Yes there is a thing called copyright but there is also artistic interpretation... did people sue Andy Warhol?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes there is a thing called copyright but there is also artistic interpretation&#8230; did people sue Andy Warhol?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2009/02/10/obama-campaign-poster-artist-sues-ap/comment-page-1/#comment-56022</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 02:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=741#comment-56022</guid>
		<description>I have just seen this regarding a way of storing copyright works.

http://offsystem.sourceforge.net/

What is your take on it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just seen this regarding a way of storing copyright works.</p>
<p><a href="http://offsystem.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://offsystem.sourceforge.net/</a></p>
<p>What is your take on it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

