<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CAL wins in the High Court: NSW Govt has no implied license to make and distribute copies of surveyors&#8217; drawings [updated]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawfont.com/2008/08/06/cal-wins-in-the-high-court-nsw-govt-has-no-implied-license-to-make-and-distribute-copies-of-surveyors-drawings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/08/06/cal-wins-in-the-high-court-nsw-govt-has-no-implied-license-to-make-and-distribute-copies-of-surveyors-drawings/</link>
	<description>an analysis of law, technology, economics, and policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:51:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donna</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/08/06/cal-wins-in-the-high-court-nsw-govt-has-no-implied-license-to-make-and-distribute-copies-of-surveyors-drawings/comment-page-1/#comment-55827</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=652#comment-55827</guid>
		<description>I wonder if the ruling will change the way surveying is done... 
perhaps Govts could employ surveyors so they own the copyright?

The more I think about it, the more wrong the ruling seems. 

Surely... the person who contracted the surveyor to do the work in the first place owns the copyright on the drawings?

Gah. Now feeling like a bear of little brain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the ruling will change the way surveying is done&#8230;<br />
perhaps Govts could employ surveyors so they own the copyright?</p>
<p>The more I think about it, the more wrong the ruling seems. </p>
<p>Surely&#8230; the person who contracted the surveyor to do the work in the first place owns the copyright on the drawings?</p>
<p>Gah. Now feeling like a bear of little brain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pfctdayelise</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/08/06/cal-wins-in-the-high-court-nsw-govt-has-no-implied-license-to-make-and-distribute-copies-of-surveyors-drawings/comment-page-1/#comment-55824</link>
		<dc:creator>pfctdayelise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/?p=652#comment-55824</guid>
		<description>Hm, thanks for mentioning the Victorian parliament inquiry! I hadn&#039;t heard about that until now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, thanks for mentioning the Victorian parliament inquiry! I hadn&#8217;t heard about that until now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
