<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Giving project homes companies big fat monopolies on new design concepts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawfont.com/2008/04/07/giving-project-homes-companies-big-fat-monopolies-on-new-design-concepts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/04/07/giving-project-homes-companies-big-fat-monopolies-on-new-design-concepts/</link>
	<description>an analysis of law, technology, economics, and policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:59:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ronald</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/04/07/giving-project-homes-companies-big-fat-monopolies-on-new-design-concepts/comment-page-1/#comment-56355</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ronald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 04:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2008/04/07/giving-project-homes-companies-big-fat-monopolies-on-new-design-concepts/#comment-56355</guid>
		<description>We Live on the gold coast queensland  The homes around us are over 10 years old ( Corrol homes-Reef sea homes) and most of them have alfresco off the kitchen /family /dining area&#039;s and under the same roofline.
As I presume these designs predate Porter Davis.  Will they now be in a position to be sued themselves
 
You can only arrange a series of boxs so far without recognisable replication
These litigations are a waste time and money and ridicule the judicery
 
Thanks
JR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We Live on the gold coast queensland  The homes around us are over 10 years old ( Corrol homes-Reef sea homes) and most of them have alfresco off the kitchen /family /dining area&#8217;s and under the same roofline.<br />
As I presume these designs predate Porter Davis.  Will they now be in a position to be sued themselves</p>
<p>You can only arrange a series of boxs so far without recognisable replication<br />
These litigations are a waste time and money and ridicule the judicery</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
JR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerry staines</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2008/04/07/giving-project-homes-companies-big-fat-monopolies-on-new-design-concepts/comment-page-1/#comment-55823</link>
		<dc:creator>gerry staines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 05:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2008/04/07/giving-project-homes-companies-big-fat-monopolies-on-new-design-concepts/#comment-55823</guid>
		<description>as an owner builder many years ago i sketched out a plan very similar to the one in your article with outdoor area under the main roof, it is logical to try to keep kitchen/dining/recreation rooms with common access to an outdoor area, i find the idea of copyright of this logical design concept weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as an owner builder many years ago i sketched out a plan very similar to the one in your article with outdoor area under the main roof, it is logical to try to keep kitchen/dining/recreation rooms with common access to an outdoor area, i find the idea of copyright of this logical design concept weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

