http://www.lawfont.com/2007/06/15/authorisation-liability-doesnt-go-to-the-high-court/ an analysis of law, technology, economics, and policy Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:59:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.lawfont.com/2007/06/15/authorisation-liability-doesnt-go-to-the-high-court/comment-page-1/#comment-55696 kim Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:15:33 +0000 http://www.lawfont.com/2007/06/15/authorisation-liability-doesnt-go-to-the-high-court/#comment-55696 Ah, thanks Rohan. That makes a lot more sense then. Strikes me as a rather strange point to take to the High Court though - why focus on just s 112E, when the High Court hasn't thought about authorisation liability generally since Moorhouse back in 1975, and certainly hasn't looked at the statutory codification of that general law interpretation? Ah, thanks Rohan. That makes a lot more sense then. Strikes me as a rather strange point to take to the High Court though – why focus on just s 112E, when the High Court hasn’t thought about authorisation liability generally since Moorhouse back in 1975, and certainly hasn’t looked at the statutory codification of that general law interpretation?

]]> http://www.lawfont.com/2007/06/15/authorisation-liability-doesnt-go-to-the-high-court/comment-page-1/#comment-55695 Rohan Higgins Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:17:14 +0000 http://www.lawfont.com/2007/06/15/authorisation-liability-doesnt-go-to-the-high-court/#comment-55695 The application for leave was unrelated to the criticisms that have been made of the Full Court decision, particularly Branson J's judgment. The application focussed almost solely on the operation of s 112E and did not address any of the more general questions about authorisation that the Full Court judgment raises. The application for leave was unrelated to the criticisms that have been made of the Full Court decision, particularly Branson J’s judgment. The application focussed almost solely on the operation of s 112E and did not address any of the more general questions about authorisation that the Full Court judgment raises.

]]>