<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TPM Inquiry Report is Out [UPDATED]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawfont.com/2006/03/02/tpm-inquiry-report-is-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/03/02/tpm-inquiry-report-is-out/</link>
	<description>an analysis of law, technology, economics, and policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:51:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: technological protection measures (TPM) &#171; Visible Procrastinations</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/03/02/tpm-inquiry-report-is-out/comment-page-1/#comment-31987</link>
		<dc:creator>technological protection measures (TPM) &#171; Visible Procrastinations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 02:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2006/03/02/tpm-inquiry-report-is-out/#comment-31987</guid>
		<description>[...] [1.] Inquiry into technological protection measures (TPM) exceptions [APH.GOV] [2.] TPM Inquiry Report is Out [UPDATED] [Weatherall&#8217;s Law] [3.] TPM Inquiry Report is Out [UPDATED] [LawFont] [4.] Aussie gov&#8217;t report on DRM: Don&#8217;t let it override public rights! [BoingBoing] [5.] Australian Parliamentary TPM Report Accepts User Concerns [Michael Geist] [6.] An Australian Perspective on DMCA Rulemaking [EFF] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [1.] Inquiry into technological protection measures (TPM) exceptions [APH.GOV] [2.] TPM Inquiry Report is Out [UPDATED] [Weatherall&#8217;s Law] [3.] TPM Inquiry Report is Out [UPDATED] [LawFont] [4.] Aussie gov&#8217;t report on DRM: Don&#8217;t let it override public rights! [BoingBoing] [5.] Australian Parliamentary TPM Report Accepts User Concerns [Michael Geist] [6.] An Australian Perspective on DMCA Rulemaking [EFF] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Australian Parliamentary TPM Report Accepts User Concerns at iMedia Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/03/02/tpm-inquiry-report-is-out/comment-page-1/#comment-9308</link>
		<dc:creator>Australian Parliamentary TPM Report Accepts User Concerns at iMedia Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2006/03/02/tpm-inquiry-report-is-out/#comment-9308</guid>
		<description>[...] Sources: Michael Geist  &#124;  LawFont.com Summary  &#124;  The Age [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sources: Michael Geist  |  LawFont.com Summary  |  The Age [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LawFont &#187; Timing, Timing, Timing - update on the TPM Inquiry Report</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/03/02/tpm-inquiry-report-is-out/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>LawFont &#187; Timing, Timing, Timing - update on the TPM Inquiry Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 01:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2006/03/02/tpm-inquiry-report-is-out/#comment-98</guid>
		<description>[...] I blogged briefly yesterday about the release of the TPM Inquiry Report; it&#8217;s been attracting some international interest, and you can see my previous post for links to that commentary. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I blogged briefly yesterday about the release of the TPM Inquiry Report; it&#8217;s been attracting some international interest, and you can see my previous post for links to that commentary. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kim</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/03/02/tpm-inquiry-report-is-out/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 01:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2006/03/02/tpm-inquiry-report-is-out/#comment-97</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve updated the post just flagging that issue, Nathan, thanks.  There is definitely a real debate about how much of this is possible - although the committee did receive views on this too.  The next stage is going to be very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve updated the post just flagging that issue, Nathan, thanks.  There is definitely a real debate about how much of this is possible &#8211; although the committee did receive views on this too.  The next stage is going to be very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.lawfont.com/2006/03/02/tpm-inquiry-report-is-out/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawfont.com/2006/03/02/tpm-inquiry-report-is-out/#comment-96</guid>
		<description>&quot;How will the executive react?&quot;

Exactly. But also, how will the US react? How much scope does Australia actually have to carve out such exceptions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How will the executive react?&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly. But also, how will the US react? How much scope does Australia actually have to carve out such exceptions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
